Smoking is not closely related to revision for periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee and hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The influence of smoking on the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains unclear. The objective was to explore the impact of smoking on PJI after primary total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty. HYPOTHESIS: Current smoking patients should have an increased risk of PIJ compared with nonsmoking patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective registry-based observational cohort study was performed. A total of 4591 patients who underwent primary TKA (3076 patients) or THA (1515) were included. According to the smoking status at the time of arthroplasty, patients were classified as nonsmokers (3031 patients), ex-smokers (688), and smokers (872). Multivariate analysis included smoking status, age, gender, education level, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, diagnosis (osteoarthritis, rheumatism), diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, perioperative blood transfusion, site of arthroplasty (knee, hip), length of operation, and length of stay. RESULTS: There were PJI after 59 (1.9%) TKA and 27 (1.8%) THA (p=0.840). There were PJI in 47 (1.6%) nonsmokers, 12 (1.7%) ex-smokers, and 17 (1.9%) smokers (p=0.413). There were wound complications (delayed wound healing and superficial wound infection) in 34 (0.7%) nonsmokers, 9 (1.3%) in ex-smokers, and 17 (1.9%) in smokers (p=0.045). In multivariate analysis, only the female gender was a significant predictor of PJI (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-2.4 [p=0.039]). Specifically, the categories of ex-smokers (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.2-1.7 [p=0.241]) and smokers (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-1.5 [p=0.052]) were not significant predictors. The 4-year arthroplasty survival with PJI as the endpoint was 99.1% (95% CI: 99.0-99.7) for nonsmokers, 99.0% (95% CI: 98.8-99.2) for ex-smokers, and 98.7% (95% CI: 98.2-99.0) for smokers was not significantly different between smoking status groups (p=0.318). DISCUSSION: Smoking was not identified as a significant predictor for PJI following primary TKA or THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prospective cohort study.

Sesamoid Position Change Over 2 Years After Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Sesamoid position change after distal chevron osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus is not well known in the literature. The objective of this study was to determine whether the sesamoid position changed over 2 years after distal chevron osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients who underwent distal chevron osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus were prospectively assessed for 2 years. There were 91 females, and the mean age was 54.9 (SD 10.9) years. The Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) was used for functional assessment. Foot pain was assessed by a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction by a 5-point Likert scale. Radiologically, hallux valgus angle (HVA), first-second intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), metatarsal head displacement, and sesamoid position by the AOFAS criteria were analyzed. Patients were classified according to the medial sesamoid position on the first postoperative weightbearing radiograph (1º-WB-Xray) into the reduced sesamoid group (66 patients) and nonreduced sesamoid group (31 patients). RESULTS: All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 month and 2 years. On the 1º-WB-Xray, IMA was significantly lower in the reduced group (P = .038), but HVA (P = .063) and DMAA (P = .246) were not significantly different. At the final follow-up, no patients in the reduced group had sesamoid position change from 1º-WB-Xray, whereas 8 (25.8%) patients in the nonreduced group had change of their sesamoid positions. The SEFAS was not significantly different between groups preoperatively (P = .386) or at 1 month postoperation (P = .064). The final SEFAS, VAS pain, and satisfaction scores were significantly better in the reduced group, although the clinical significance of these changes remains unknown. CONCLUSION: A nonreduced position of the sesamoids obtained in surgery can cause their increased malposition over 2 postoperative years and statistically less functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Varus alignment of the tibial component up to seven degrees is not associated with poor long-term outcomes in a neutrally aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of varus alignment of the tibial component on the outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The hypothesis was that varus alignment of the tibial component might not affect the outcomes and survival of a neutrally aligned primary TKA. METHODS: A matched case-control study was designed between 66 patients with varus alignment of the tibial component and 66 with neutral alignment with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Functional outcome was assessed with the knee surgery scores (KSS) and reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities questionnaire (WOMAC). Patient satisfaction was evaluated by a 0-10 visual analog scale. Radiological evaluation was performed at early postoperative and at final follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 11.9 (SD 2.6) years for both groups. The mean postoperative proximal tibial angle in the varus group was 85.0° (SD 0.9) and 88.8° (SD 0.9) in control group. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences in KSS, WOMAC, range of motion or patient satisfaction. There were no differences in the coronal anatomical alignment of the TKA between groups. Revision of TKA was performed in four knees in the varus group, and one in control group, due to aseptic loosening of the tibial component in all cases. TKA survival at 10 years was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The alignment of the tibial component up to 7° varus did not negatively affect implant survival, patient satisfaction, and function of a well-aligned TKA, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 10 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.